TPT
Total:
$0.00

Think Like a Philosopher: Social Contract Theory Small Group Activity

Rated 5 out of 5, based on 1 reviews
5.0 (1 rating)
;
Grade Levels
7th - 12th
Resource Type
Standards
Formats Included
  • Google Drive™ folder
$4.25
$4.25
Share this resource
Report this resource to TPT
Made for Google Drive™
This resource can be used by students on Google Drive or Google Classroom. To access this resource, you’ll need to allow TPT to add it to your Google Drive. See our FAQ and Privacy Policy for more information.

What educators are saying

My middle school class had lots of fun with this. Our school started using Capturing Kids Hearts so I decided to look at some real social contracts. This lesson was great and all range of "it could happen" was suggested. Created lots of good dialog and (unexpected) alliances in the classroom.
Also included in
  1. Introduce philosophy to your students with these two unique lessons! These lessons are like a good recipe, you just have to follow the instructions for best results. Both lessons have detailed lesson plans and classroom refined activities and assessments. These work as a 90 minute stand alone lesson
    Price $5.75Original Price $8.75Save $3.00

Description

Great Class Opener! Potential for More! Get your Students Thinking About Their World!

Students debate and discuss the philosophical question, "Are humans inherently evil or inherently good?"

Simple, but engaging, The Think Like a Philosopher: Social Contract Theory lesson has students discuss and debate the question, "Are humans inherently evil or inherently good?" This group discussion activity will introduce students to the enlightenment philosophy made famous by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke through the use of peer learning and small group communication.

The lesson stresses active, student-centered learning. Light on the informational text, but designed to get students connecting their original thoughts to the tenets of social contract theory. Students feel empowered and smart when working with this lesson. It works great at demystifying 19th-century philosophy.

This is also a great unit to get students flexing their critical thinking skills and demonstrating proper group communication skills as well. I usually use this as a standalone lesson when I'm in between units or near the beginning or end of a semester. But, it can also be incorporated easily into English Literature and Civics classes that deal with issues such as equality, liberty, and the benefits and disadvantages of claiming membership in a society.

Included in this unit:

Think Like a Philosopher Google Slides Presentation - Fully edited and scripted to help you engage students in the lesson and activity.

Avocados vs. Mangos Student Group Activity - This activity has students choose to be a part of either the Mango society or the Avocado society. They must then develop a plan that will ensure their two societies can fairly trade their goods with one another. It contrasts the theories of Hobbes and Locke by explaining them in the presentation and then connecting student answers to the particular theory. Are humans inherently good or are they inherently bad?

Lesson Extension Persuasive Speaking Prompts - Included at the end of the Google Slides presentation are several extension lessons students can engage with in order to extend the lesson. Again, stressing active, student-centered learning the persuasive speaking prompts allow students to practice their public speaking, while also thinking deeply about social contract theory.

Lesson Extension Teacher Rubric - A simple, but effective rubric to grade student's persuasive speeches.

Teacher Lesson Plan - A step-by-step instruction plan that includes learning objectives!

Total Pages
Answer Key
Rubric only
Teaching Duration
50 minutes
Report this resource to TPT
Reported resources will be reviewed by our team. Report this resource to let us know if this resource violates TPT’s content guidelines.

Standards

to see state-specific standards (only available in the US).
Engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grade 7 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly.
Follow rules for collegial discussions, track progress toward specific goals and deadlines, and define individual roles as needed.
Pose questions that elicit elaboration and respond to others’ questions and comments with relevant observations and ideas that bring the discussion back on topic as needed.
Analyze the main ideas and supporting details presented in diverse media and formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) and explain how the ideas clarify a topic, text, or issue under study.
Present claims and findings, emphasizing salient points in a focused, coherent manner with pertinent descriptions, facts, details, and examples; use appropriate eye contact, adequate volume, and clear pronunciation.

Reviews

Questions & Answers