STARS Scientific Writing Analysis
Innovation Collaboration Creativity Biology
6 Followers
Grade Levels
7th - 12th
Subjects
Resource Type
Standards
CCSSRST.6-8.1
CCSSRST.6-8.2
CCSSRST.9-10.1
CCSSRST.9-10.2
CCSSRST.11-12.1
Formats Included
- Word Document File
Pages
2 pages
Innovation Collaboration Creativity Biology
6 Followers
Description
Are your students struggling with reading and comprehending complex scientific articles? Do they often use somewhat unrelated sources or quotes in the midst of their confusion?
I developed this resource in response to my own students' struggles, and it has greatly helped them when searching for resources (and quotes within) that most effectively support their research topic. The provided resource includes an outline of the STARS procedure, as well as an example to model from, and a student work page. This is not meant to replace APA or MLA citing, but rather supplement traditional bibliographies by providing students a structure on which to organize their findings and information.
Total Pages
2 pages
Answer Key
Does not apply
Teaching Duration
30 minutes
Last updated Nov 12th, 2017
Report this resource to TPT
Reported resources will be reviewed by our team. Report this resource to let us know if this resource violates TPT’s content guidelines.
Standards
to see state-specific standards (only available in the US).
CCSSRST.6-8.1
Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts.
CCSSRST.6-8.2
Determine the central ideas or conclusions of a text; provide an accurate summary of the text distinct from prior knowledge or opinions.
CCSSRST.9-10.1
Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts, attending to the precise details of explanations or descriptions.
CCSSRST.9-10.2
Determine the central ideas or conclusions of a text; trace the text’s explanation or depiction of a complex process, phenomenon, or concept; provide an accurate summary of the text.
CCSSRST.11-12.1
Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts, attending to important distinctions the author makes and to any gaps or inconsistencies in the account.